AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ultimaker cura vs cura3/20/2023 Overusing our search engine with a very large number of searches in a very short amount of time.Using a badly configured (or badly written) browser add-on for blocking content.Running a "scraper" or "downloader" program that either does not identify itself or uses fake headers to elude detection.Using a script or add-on that scans GameFAQs for box and screen images (such as an emulator front-end), while overloading our search engine.There is no official GameFAQs app, and we do not support nor have any contact with the makers of these unofficial apps. Continued use of these apps may cause your IP to be blocked indefinitely. This triggers our anti-spambot measures, which are designed to stop automated systems from flooding the site with traffic. Some unofficial phone apps appear to be using GameFAQs as a back-end, but they do not behave like a real web browser does.Using GameFAQs regularly with these browsers can cause temporary and even permanent IP blocks due to these additional requests. If you are using Maxthon or Brave as a browser, or have installed the Ghostery add-on, you should know that these programs send extra traffic to our servers for every page on the site that you browse.The most common causes of this issue are: Im guessing that the reason Cura shows less stringing for me is because it prints the infill last, then moves over the wall to continue printing elsewhere, essentially creating a wipe move.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. Slowing down my print speed isnt an option either, frankly id rather have a fast print with some strings over a perfect print that takes twice as long in most casesĮdit to add - Okay, so after posting this i took a closer look at the Gcode each slicer generates, and rewatched that Makers Muse video, and realized that the biggest difference i could see that would effect stringing the most is that by default, Cura prints the perimeter first, then goes back and does the infill, whereas SS prints from the inside out. Printer is mechanically solid and well calibrated, and ive already done all the usual experiments with retraction and temperature to eliminate the stringing, no luck. In case it helps, im running an Ender 5 with an SKR Mini E3 with Klipper installed and being controlled through a Pi Zero running FluiddPi. So, is there anything that i can do to make one slicer behave more like the other to get a 'perfect' slicer? My ideal solution would be to eliminate the stringing when using SS, but if theres a combination of plugins i can use in Cura that would get me the same print speeds, and maybe the build plate corner discs and surface skin options, im not really opposed to that option either Im pretty sure that the issue im having is the same as whats mentioned in this video by Makers Muse, so its not a complete mystery, but it is annoying The biggest issue im having with SS is stringing, despite printing at the same temperatures, using the same retraction settings, and with pressure advance running to boot, i get pretty bad stringing with SS sliced files that just doesnt happen with cure. The biggest advantage to Cura is i somehow get better print quality, despite using the same settings on both slicers. Personally, i feel that the Cura interface is cleaner and more user-friendly, though thats probably just because im more used to it. Also, its a really small thing, but i like the different options for first and last layer patterns, gives a nice finishing touch to my printsĭespite my like for SS, im still having a hard time convincing myself to move away from Cura. Moving parts around is a lot smoother, and i really like the seam and support painting options. I also like the option to add the little adhesion buttons to the first layer, to keep sharp corners from pulling up, they work great when youre printing at 100mm/s. The arrange function in SS works miles better than Cura, thats a big plus for me. Im sure that at least a little of that is just inaccuracy in slicer estimation, but theres inaccuracy and than theres a 4 hour differenceĪnother thing i like is just general build management. Majority of the time, im printing as fast as possible, and i dunno what black magic SS pulls but i can use the same print parameters on the exact same build plate and SS gives me a print time of 14 hours and change, Cura shows 18 hours, despite SS actually having lower speeds set for certain features than Cura. So far, i wouldnt say that SS is outright better, but there certainly are aspects of it that blow cura out of the water for me. Ive been using Cura ever since i started with a 3d printer, and it certainly gets the job done, but i figured why not learn a new thing, maybe its better SuperSlicer has been coming up more and more as the next big slicer lately, so i figured id give it a shot, and so far im liking it.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |